There are certain significant tax and planning advantages in having an offshore insurance policy. For tax purposes, an offshore policy and a domestic policy must meet the same rules. That is, there is nothing available offshore that cannot be available onshore in terms of insurance product design. However, offshore insurance companies do have policies available, which meet the US rules, but are not offered by US companies. Such policies allow the policy owner to utilize the services of one or more independent investment advisors.
The tax code specifically provides that the use of an independent investment advisor shall not be prohibited. This flexibility allows the independent advisor to have investments in both public-type investments as well as private-type investments. In other words, the investments are not required to be restricted to mutual funds offered by an insurance company.
Additionally, offshore insurance policies offer a level of security not available domestically. In the Cayman Islands, for example, the underlying insurance law provides that assets held in the segregated asset accounts of an insurance company will not be subject to the claims of the insurance company's creditors. Assets held in these segregated asset accounts can only be paid to the policy owner in the event of the liquidation of the insurance company.
In the case of a domestic policy, the policy owner is an unsecured creditor of the insurance company and must therefore rely on the financial solvency of the insurance company in order to be assured of the policy benefit being paid off at death. This risk, which is significant, is avoidable in an insurance policy, which has been issued offshore under the right insurance law.
Finally, as a practical matter, an offshore policy gives a high level of asset protection for the assets held under the policy. Most states provide for some amount of protection for life insurance proceeds, but not fully. Some states, such as Florida, have laws, which may expose insurance policies to a lawsuit making them available to creditors.
For example, while Florida exempts life insurance proceeds and cash surrender value, there have been cases where the acquisition of insurance was held to be a fraudulent conveyance even though the proceeds are exempt. By acquiring an offshore policy, it is possible to gain a much higher level of real wealth protection. In a world with plenty of uncertainty, there is no sense taking avoidable risks. |